Ok. So i'm reading about how people in general cannot get an XHS9 HDSI 180T 2yield good readings at anything more than 10mph & seems 2me (from what i've read), the problems seem 2narrow down to 3 main things (assuming the Transducer is in decent shape of course): 1>Steady Power Supply 2>Solid/Secure Fixture Mount 3>Prop Turbulence/Backwash... and Yes, although there can be several more than just the 3 aforementioned - Those 3 are Not always as quick 2solve as something along the lines of adjusting "Transducer angle/ overall squareness" or perhaps ascertaining that "the Transducer is in the water deep enuff" which can be quickly solved moreso via observation & subtle adjustments.
Now with that being said, it makes me wonder if the Compact XNT9 180SI T although Not having 800khz capability(s) would be able 2operate at near twice the speed(s) of the HDSI and lastly, seeing as i presently own Both of these Transducers, would be moreso a matter of myself getting my Butt out on the water & doing a little testing 2 C 4myself... Only 1 way 2 find out really... Perhaps i'm being a bit presumptuous & getting a little ahead of myself But an opportunity 2 pick up a Plastic Thru Hull HDSI has crossed my path & wondering if i should go fetch it before it's gone & hence my query as I found some1 selling some Plastic Thru Hull Transducers. My boat is a little Fibreglass Bowrider Fish/Ski & perhaps some1 on the Forum could lend me a little advice based on previous experience with this sort of thing?
PLS See attached Pics & let me know if this might be a better route 2 take by purchasing & installing these items. I know the 1 pic is a bit blurry But wondering IF these items would help me to Cover Water a little quicker than more Traditional Methods & hence the Title "Transom Mount HDSI vs Plastic Thru Hull HDSI"?
Thanks, Sandro (Swann)