Humminbird Side Imaging Forums

General => General Discussion => Topic started by: sonar2000 on March 14, 2010, 04:54:00 PM

Title: 455 vs 800 display
Post by: sonar2000 on March 14, 2010, 04:54:00 PM

Here are two pictures of the same location. the first is at 800 khz.
[attachment=1]
and the second is at 455khz.
[attachment=2]
the value of the review and the humfinder kept us from initiating a dive that was not necessary.   
Chuck

Title: Re: 455 vs 800 display
Post by: Chiboo on March 14, 2010, 05:13:57 PM

Hi, Chuck ! ;D
Whether you wished to tell that 800Hz shows more accurately??  ;D

Title: Re: 455 vs 800 display
Post by: Chiboo on March 14, 2010, 05:19:55 PM

I esteemed much on the Internet and it appears there are technologies which HB can make and probably already does - BlueView, Didson etc....... To wait or not??  Yes.... Can all the same programmers will be in time??

Note to this post:
chibo.  it would be great if the architect platform for the viewers were all the same, Instead of different platforms.   chuck

Title: Re: 455 vs 800 display
Post by: sonar2000 on March 14, 2010, 05:22:46 PM

Not sure what to tell.   Except that if we had gone on the 800 alone we would have put divers in the water.  Since we had the two runs we looked at both and decided to go with the 455.  We will be looking at  this in the future for standard scan guides.  We really dont want divers to be in the water if there is not a very good reason for them to dive.  all this SI and now with DI  we have tools to keep the divers safe.  It may be that his topic might want to be moved to the S&R portion of the topics.  I just found this interesting..
chuck

Title: Re: 455 vs 800 display
Post by: Chiboo on March 14, 2010, 05:33:55 PM

Fairly, I too would not send divers if there was no serious necessity...... I read about other technologies of an identification much.